In my last post, I wrote about the crucial role network services play in underpinning cloud and managed services — and notably in enabling your technology services provider to wield a mix of customizable services they can tailor specifically to your business’s needs.
As you migrate more and more of your data to cloud environments, you’ve probably noticed a couple of things:
1 Data gravity
It’s not your imagination: as you’ve embraced cloud computing, the data still outside your cloud(s) really does get pulled toward applications running in your cloud(s).
Finding the technology skillsets you need when you need them is getting tougher all the time, as my last post attests. If you’re like many enterprises, you’re engaging more than one staffing service in hopes of ending staff deficits.
So here’s my advice about what to look for in a technology staffing services provider:
By some reports, hiring (and keeping) competent information technology talent has never been so difficult.
To an extent, technology talent struggles vary in degree according to industry subsector and location. Cybersecurity, for instance, faces particularly intense shortages of much-needed experts. Some expect one million cybersecurity job openings this year, and even demand for entry-level cybersecurity slots, like information security analysts, is projected to climb by 37% over the next six years.
In my last post, I advised that a technology consulting services provider should offer a range of capabilities that encompasses integrated managed services , cloud services , and assessments as well as an extensive professional services portfolio emphasizing technology customization and solid technical staffing .
Such technology consulting depth means your provider can help you in many ways, including:
For a long time, the most effective way for an organization to benefit from the power of IT required committing to a single vendor’s technology ecosystem.
You bought or leased the designated hardware on which you ran the designated software and, perhaps, a compatible service or two. But when you inevitably bumped into the limits of your chosen technology ecosystem, you faced a stark choice:
Either give up on that capability you were hoping to implement in the manner that would serve your business best — or alter the way your business operated in order to “sort of” get at least some of what you needed from the technology ecosystem in which you’d already invested plenty.
Typically, technology customization stayed out of reach and businesses were cornered into the second option, forced to adapt to the technology tools available rather than the other way around. Certainly, the ecosystem vendors didn’t mind, as customer lock-in proved extremely profitable.
